Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Bounce effect or local recurrence after low-dose-rate brachytherapy of the prostate? When prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography is false positive: a case report

Abstract

Introduction

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy has been increasingly utilized as a minimally invasive treatment option in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Following 1–2 years of treatment, a “bounce phenomenon” might occur in approximately 30% of patients undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy, characterized by a transient rise in prostate-specific antigen levels followed by a subsequent decrease. This phenomenon has been identified as a favorable prognostic factor. To date, only a few cases of a potential false-positive prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography related to the bounce phenomenon have been reported in literature. By presenting our clinical case, we aim to suggest refinements in the follow-up strategies and to assess the diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography in managing cases with the bounce phenomenon.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old Caucasian (western European) male patient achieved a prostate-specific antigen nadir of 1.37 µg/l at 9 months after undergoing brachytherapy. At 21 months post-procedure, his prostate-specific antigen rose to 4.16 µg/l—following a period of stable and low prostate-specific antigen levels—prompting his general practitioner to refer him for prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography (298 MBq F-18-PSMA). Imaging revealed a prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesion within the prostate, suggesting a local recurrence, resulting in the offer of salvage therapy for the patient. However, a routine prostate-specific antigen screening before initiating salvage radiotherapy revealed a decrease to 3.75 µg/l with an additional reduction to 2.68 µg/l at 2 months later. The pattern of transient prostate-specific antigen elevation strongly suggested a bounce phenomenon rather than a recurrence, allowing any unnecessary treatment to be avoided. To date, prostate-specific antigen levels have been decreasing to as low as 0.48 µg/l, showing a satisfactory progress.

Conclusion

Our case illustrates a sporadically recognized false-positive prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography finding associated with a bounce phenomenon following low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. A single prostate-specific antigen test effectively ruled out the suspicion of local recurrence. While prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography is undoubtedly a valuable tool for detecting metastasis postoperatively, careful interpretation of local findings is essential owing to the potential for false positives. This consideration is vital when evaluating a patient with a rising prostate-specific antigen level after brachytherapy, to avoid premature initiation of salvage therapy.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in men, with over 1.4 million new cases estimated in 2020 all over the world [1]. Various radiotherapeutic approaches are available for the definitive treatment of prostate cancer, including low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), a well-established standard treatment for early-stage prostate cancer. LDR-BT offers improved oncological outcomes, a reasonable amount of irradiation, and favorable quality of life. First introduced by Grimm et al., it is often applied for likely organ-confined disease owing to its targeted high-dose delivery to the prostate with a rapid dose fall-off to surrounding tissues, thereby reducing the risk of complications [2]. Compared with radical prostatectomy, 125I implantation offers advantages as a less invasive outpatient procedure with higher rates of sexual potency preservation and reduced acute morbidity such as urinary incontinence [3]. In approximately 30% of patients treated with LDR-BT, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) “bounce phenomenon” (BP) might occur 1–2 years post-treatment, defined as a transient PSA rise of 0.2 µg/l above the nadir followed by a decline to or below the original nadir without intervention [4,5,6]. Notably, the PSA BP has been associated with favorable prognosis [7].

To date, there is limited experience examining false-positive prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) findings related to the BP. Potential causes of local failure following brachytherapy remain uncertain. It could be challenging to achieve an optimal distribution of seeds within the prostate for adequate dose coverage or selecting appropriate candidates for monotherapy [8].

This report aims to evaluate the role of PSMA PET-CT in cases with the bounce phenomenon to give recommendations for follow-up protocols.

Case presentation

Our patient, a 67-year-old Caucasian (western European) male, presented in late 2020 for screening following a PSA elevation to 4.97 µg/l without any palpable nodules. Prostate MRI revealed a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesion, prompting a transperineal biopsy on 15 December 2020. Histopathological examination confirmed prostate cancer (PCa) with Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7a in 1 of 12 cores. The patient reported an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 7/35 and a Quality of Life Score (QoL) of 1/6, following an operation via Millin approach in 2019. Given his elevated risk of incontinence, the patient opted against radical prostatectomy, choosing 125I brachytherapy instead. This approach was deemed suitable as the case was classified as intermediate risk, considering that his PSA was below 10 µg/l, his Gleason score was 7a in only one core, and he maintained a favorable IPSS score. The patient underwent pre-implantation planning with ultrasound, and 125I brachytherapy was successfully completed on 9 March 2021. The prescribed peripheral dose was 145 Gy. The postoperative course was uneventful. At 6 months post-procedure, the patient reported satisfactory urination with no occurrences of hematuria, incontinence, diarrhea, or hematochezia. PSA levels had decreased to 1.37 µg/l by 8 months post-implantation.

Approximately 6 months later, PSA levels slightly increased to 1.5 µg/l, which was not concerning at the time. However, a subsequent evaluation in November 2022 revealed a PSA rise to 4.16 µg/l characteristic of biochemical failure (BF) per the definition of American Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology (ASTRO). This indicated a need for re-evaluation of patient management. A 298 MBq F-18-PSMA PET-CT scan identified a local recurrence within the prostate (Fig. 1), with no evidence of metastatic disease.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography showing a suspicious local recurrence of prostate cancer (red arrow A and B)

A follow-up PSA measurement was conducted after 4 weeks to measure the doubling time. Unexpectedly, this assessment revealed a decrease to 3.75 µg/l. In January 2023, a further decline was apparent to 2.68 µg/l. At 1.5 years later, his PSA was as low as 0.48 µg/l (Fig. 2). Considering this regressive PSA, additional therapies were deemed unnecessary.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The patient’s prostate-specific antigen level trends

Discussion

Monitoring PSA levels post-therapy is essential during the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer [9]. Generally, a steady decline in PSA levels is expected following brachytherapy (BT); however, PSA kinetics may sometimes display a transient rise, known as the BP [7]. The biochemical underpinnings of this phenomenon remain unclear, although it is suggested that PSA shedding may result from cellular damage. Alternatively, the BP may be attributed to inflammation or the presence of residual prostate tissue [10, 11].

In terms of timing, the bounce phenomenon is generally reported to occur between 12 and 24 months post-BT, although it can emerge as early as 6 months or as late as 48 months following LDR-BT [12]. Biochemical failure (BF) after BT is observed in approximately 24% of patients and has been associated with improved overall survival [7].

A previously reported case showed almost identical characteristics of disease progression with an PSA increase approximately 30 months after BT [14]. In our case, biochemical failure (BF) occurred around 18 months post-LDR-BT, defined by the ASTRO criteria as a PSA increase of nadir + 2 µg/l, like following external beam radiotherapy.

This case illustrates a decision in agreement with the guideline to perform a PSMA PET-CT to assess potential tumor recurrence as a result of significant PSA increase. Despite imaging findings suggestive of localized recurrence in the prostate, follow-up PSA measurements subsequently showed a decrease, allowing us to avoid further investigations or even the need for salvage therapy. PSMA is a commonly used tracer for prostate cancer imaging, and it is essential to carefully assess and rule out nonspecific uptake in benign lesions [13]. This outcome was interpreted as a likely false-positive PSMA PET finding localized to the prostate.

Conclusion

Patients experiencing a PSA bounce tend to have improved biochemical relapse-free survival. The timing of the PSA rise after reaching the nadir can vary, occurring as early as 15 months or even up to 30 months following brachytherapy (BT).

This case highlights the critical need for cautious interpretation of PSMA PET-CT findings after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for prostate cancer. A transient PSA increase post-BT, even exceeding + 3 µg/l, does not necessarily indicate local recurrence. This consideration is vital when evaluating a patient with a rising PSA level after BT, to avoid premature initiation of salvage therapy.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated and/or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

LDR-BT:

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy

BP:

Bounce phenomenon

BF:

Biochemical failure

CT:

Computed tomography

PCa:

Prostate cancer

PI-RADS:

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System

References

  1. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(8):1893–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grimm PD, Blasko JC, Sylvester JE, et al. 10-year biochemical (prostatespecific antigen) control of prostate cancer with 125I brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liang Z, Yuliang C, Zhu M, Zhou Y, Wu X, Li H, Fan B, Zhou Z, Yan W. The direct prognosis comparison of 125I low-dose-rate brachytherapy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01140-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciezki JP, Reddy CA, Garcia J, Angermeier K, Ulchaker J, Ma-hadevan A, Chehade N, Altman A, Klein EA. PSA kinetics after prostate brachytherapy: das PSA-Bounce-Phänomen und seine Auswirkungen auf die PSA-Verdopplungszeit. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:512–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crook J, Gillan C, Yeung I, Austen L, McLean M, Lockwood G. PSA kinetics and PSA bounce following permanent seed prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:426–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caloglu M, Ciezki JP, Reddy CA, Angermeier K, Ulchaker J, Chehade N, Altman A, Magi-Galuzzi C, Klein EA. PSA bounce and biochemical failure after brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a study of 820 patients with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(3):735–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Engeler D, Schwab C, Thöni A, et al. PSA bounce after 125I-brachytherapy for prostate cancer as a favorable prognosticator. Strahlenther Onkol. 2015;191:787–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-015-0860-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kollmeier MA, Stock RG, Stone N. Biochemical outcomes after prostate brachytherapy with 5-year minimal follow-up: importance of patient selection and implant quality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:645–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simmons MN, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA. Natural history of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: risk assessment for secondary therapy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1175–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosser CJ, Kamat AM, Wang X, Do K-A, Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Kuban DA, Lee AK, Cheung R, Chichakli R, Pisters LL. Is patient age a factor in the occurrence of prostate-specific antigen bounce phenomenon after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer? Urologie. 2005;66:327–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka N, Asakawa I, Fujimoto K, Anai S, Hirayama A, Hasega-wa M, Konishi N, Hirao Y. Minimal percentage of dose received by 90 % of the urethra (% UD90) is the most significant predictor of PSA bounce in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-brachytherapy) for prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2012;12:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaztañaga M, Crook J. Interpreting a rising prostate-specific antigen after brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2013;20:142–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghosh S, Agrawal A, Choudhury S, Purandare NC, Rangarajan V. A case series depicting PSMA expression in nonmalignant lesions. Indian J Nucl Med. 2024;39(2):129–34. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_113_23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedro VP, Sistani G, Rachinsky I, Zukotynski K, Bauman G, Liu W. Case—prostate-specific antigen bounce: a pitfall in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography interpretation. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15(11):E620–1. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Written and constructed by TR. ED and HS carried out supervision. CS conceived the study, participated in its design, and helped to draft the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamas Rozsos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the journal editor.

Competing interests

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rozsos, T., Engeler, D.S., Schmid, HP. et al. Bounce effect or local recurrence after low-dose-rate brachytherapy of the prostate? When prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography is false positive: a case report. J Med Case Reports 19, 242 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05268-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05268-1

Keywords